It's a common view posited by many people of faith, but it just
isn't true - and such claims give a bad impression of theists' ability to
understand the evolution of morality. It is impossible for religious
codifications to be the basis of morality because, as anyone who understands the
problem of the criterion would know, it is not possible to construct any kind
of moral codification without an already existent evolved moral awareness by
which to judge those constructs. Or to put it another way: you can't assess the
rights and wrongs of ethical codes without first having an understanding of
rights and wrongs.
Even as a person of faith I repeatedly find myself reminding
fellow believers that morality is a humanly constructed phenomenon that evolved
to aid us in survival and reproduction. It's true that religion did get in
first in our historical attempts to codify that evolved morality into a set of
ethical laws and practices, but it's rather misjudged to suggest that without
it we wouldn’t have evolved all the refined notions of rights and wrongs. Of
course we would - as humans continued to culturally evolve we would always further enhance our moral philosophies and ethical sensibilities - it's part of our natural assent towards bit-by-bit improvement. It's
through understanding that morality is a human construct that we have the best chance of understanding
why Christianity is something altogether superior to mere morality.
No comments:
Post a Comment